this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
377 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19088 readers
4313 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/x0dZM

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis tore into House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan on Thursday in a searing letter accusing the Ohio Republican of trying to obstruct her criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

“There is no justification in the Constitution for Congress to interfere with a state criminal matter, as you attempt to do,” Willis wrote in the nine-page retort to Jordan, whose committee last month launched a probe into the district attorney’s prosecution of Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teft@startrek.website 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh man everyone needs to read that letter. It's a thorough tearing apart of Jordan's demands. She throws shade left and right and I love it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“Here is another reality you must face: Those who wish to avoid felony charges in Fulton County, Georgia — including violations of Georgia RICO law — should not commit felonies in Fulton County, Georgia,” Willis wrote.

Damn.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

‘Moreover, “investigations conducted solely for the personal aggrandizement of the investigators or to ‘punish’ those investigated are indefensible.”’

2nd paragraph and already has him on pucker status right out of the gate.

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago

If only republicans could read, they would be very upset.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"STOP BREAKING THE LAW, ASSHOLE" Only, you know, professional.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think Jim Carrey could have managed the professional version with a straight face

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know how he did any of that movie with a straight face.

[–] archonet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

man, I dunno if she's gonna get a conviction, but this is definitely going to be the Watergate of this century, the defining political shitshow for a generation. And it's gonna be fantastic to watch.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way this doesn't end in a conviction is if a Magat ends up on the jury.

Fuck, that's pretty likely, isn't it?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Would be amazing to be on that jury, wear a red MAGA hat, and then vote to convict.

[–] baccano@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read it on your good recommendation. Was not disappointed. That woman is fire! She even ends it with recommendations for congress on broader issues related to the justice system they could be working on. 10/10, no notes.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A shame Jim Jordan, or any of the Republican shit heads, won't read it. Same with the Muller report, the one that did read it reacted with "holy shit you guys should read this, it's really bad"and then radio silence.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, Jim Jordan, the guy who covered up child rape? The Jim Jordan who covered up child rape and is a member of the US House of Representatives? That Jim Jordan?

It’s fuckin’ SPICY and I am here for it. Outstanding!