Asklemmy

43963 readers

2412 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What should individual communities on Lemmy be called? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Schooner@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reddit has subreddits. What does Lemmy go with?

My personal vote is for lemmings!

Edit: I am personally leaning towards Sublemmy now. It retains the context of being a forum under the general sphere of Lemmy and the connection to Reddit lets people know immediately what Lemmy is about. Thanks to @BurningnnTree@lemmy.one for the comment!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did anyone have troubles to recall or to understand "community"? It's a quite self-explanatory term, because it is generic.

Also, please consider:

the documentation calls it community
the unchangeable URL refers to it: /c/

For many, lemmy is already complex and hard to understand. I'm worried things like these (if adopted) would make it even less accessible.

[–] Schooner@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one will connect a generic term like community to Lemmy. This kinda hurts the awareness of it as a service people can use. Having something more catchy will at least get people asking.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 1 year ago

You do have a point. And while I was arguing all for accessibility, I feel an argument for 'accessibility' can also be made the other way. When people have an easier time connecting with an idea emotionally, it can make it easier for them to learn about it. So yeah, I guess it isn't as obvious as I tried to make it look. I have no conclusion yet.