this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
113 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

52 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

A growing number of instances (mainly of Mastodon so far) are signing an 'Anti-Meta Fedi Pact', pledging to block any instance owned by Meta in the fediverse.

I don't know how big this will get or how effective it will be, but if you run a fediverse instance, you should take a look at this https://fedipact.online/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Silejonu@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Modal@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very reasonable and I think sums up my feelings on it as well.

I avoid meta like the plague but making some kind of pre-emptive pact to block it in an open ecosystem seems a lot like a gatekeeping bandwagon; they don't even bother to list an actual reason.

[–] JackRiddle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

A good actual reason is to preemptively kill any attempt at embrace, extend, extinguish. Meta is like a cancer. It won't stop until it has taken all of our users and the fediverse collapses. It's less gatekeeping and more keeping poison out of the system.