this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
905 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59568 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Lawsuit says network discloses user data at request of Saudi authorities at much higher rate than for US, UK and Canada"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Tyfud@lemmy.one 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Correct. This is largely for a time pre Musk.

[–] KIM_JONG@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Back in those innocent times when they were just murdering journalists and cremating them in barrels.

[–] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

The major connection of SA to twitter before Musk was Prince Alwaleed but it doesn't add up because he was one of those being purged by MbS..

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol I'm being downvoted. That's hilarious

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most folks read comments before articles. Unless you’re more specific about timeframe you’ll fall into the same trap as folks commenting before reading as well.

That being said when an apartheid, blood emerald silver spoon sucking moron takes over twitter and proceeds to ban speech as a “free speech absolutist” all while racist, vile, toxic bullshit floods the platform it’s not weird that people make a connection.

It’s not accurate per this article but I think all of this, people’s comments, the article, the context… it is outlining a pattern that this dipshit is absolutely a part of.

A desperate attention seeking piece of shit taking Saudi money to do the thing isn’t too far off from this article about saudis doing the thing. Though it’s not apt , it’s kinda related.

[–] Palerider 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That being said when an apartheid, blood emerald silver spoon sucking moron takes over twitter with Saudi money and proceeds to ban speech as a “free speech absolutist” all while racist, vile, toxic bullshit floods the platform it’s not weird that people make a connection.

Fixed that for you.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“A desperate attention seeking piece of shit taking Saudi money to do the thing isn’t too far off from this article about saudis doing the thing. Though it’s not apt , it’s kinda related. “

You’d think that part is clear enough. Yet you are upvoted and I am downvoted. The internet speaks

[–] Palerider 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I'm certainly guilty of not reading the article. You got an upvote from me though.

I should stop browsing and posting last thing at night after having a couple of beers.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

But that’s when the good shit comes out.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, but it establishes how useful a tool a Twitter you control is to crushing dissent. Which explains why they helped Musk buy it - as bad as Twitter’s previous management may have been, they at least tried to appear honorable. Musk is really leaning into the authoritarian bootlicker thing, so I’m sure he’s eager to get Tesla programmers in there to find new ways to hunt down dissidents.

[–] themajesticdodo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The statement is still true, though? They got value out of it previously so they would be happy to float money to Elon to keep it useful for them.