this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
145 points (91.4% liked)

Hacker News

4122 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Nuclear has never been good, just an "oh shit, we left it too late".

Nuclear will be good when there is no wind, at night, with limited hydro and storage. The excitement with it has been from years of industry astroturfing. Seeing reddit go from opposed to, celebrating nuclear as thinking it was superior to all other renewables was a wild ride.

[–] pinkwerdo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

False. Solar PV, hydro and wind are superior without the nuclear waste problem.

Nuclear has a purpose in the mix, but more in a supporting role.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The nuclear waste problem's solution is stick it in the side of a mountain in the middle of nowhere.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In good environmentally friendly concrete. So greeen.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you think hydroelectric dams get built with?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Once with concrete which lasts decades. But nuclear plants produce waste every day that needs concrete for decades. And they are built with concrete.

Nice try.

[–] 3L54@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nuclear is easily the safest, cleanest and most efficient form of energy production. Until we get to nuclear fusion.