84
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10178 readers
546 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've never held security clearance, but I'm reasonably certain that "I was too busy to give you back those classified documents" isn't a very good defense. In fact, it's admitting that you had the classified documents and held onto them despite being told to give them back. It's especially not a good defense given that he had 15 months from the first "give back the documents request" to the FBI raid.
If I ever found myself in possession of classified documents which I wasn't supposed to have (so, any classified documents) and I was asked to give them back, I'd MAKE time. I'd take time off of work and scour my house from the top to the bottom to make sure I got everything. Then, I'd invite the FBI in to do the same to be sure that I didn't miss anything.
This would be the biggest priority in my life (absent any live threatening situations) until those classified documents were safely returned. "I was too busy for the past 1.25 years" is not a good defense at all.