this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
372 points (96.5% liked)

Work Reform

9997 readers
169 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

man, the vast majority of states are a lot lower than i would have expected.

[–] steveman_ha@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's because state-level analysis is misleading, it masks disparities within states. The state-level analysis can be seen as a weighted average between rural and urban areas, for example, depending on how "sampling" is done.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh that makes sense. I always laugh when people talk about average wages between blue and red states because any decent business mind who is in agriculture basically takes zero wages but drive brand new trucks and have herds of horses and cows.

[–] steveman_ha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hmm! I feel like this helps explain rural areas in my state that seem to be doing pretty well, despite being in counties with some of the lowest household incomes. Been kind of wondering about this for a while actually, but hadn't really thought about it I guess~

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, everything is a business expense, housing, fuel, vehicles, clothing... meeting the neighboring farmers at the diner every morning for breakfast and coffee? That's business meeting.