this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
722 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
695 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chromium should be enough of a reason to get rid of it.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You have the choice between the engine made by Google and the engine paid for by Google.

Brave at least has its own search engine, something Mozilla doesn't even dare, as that's where they get all their Google money from.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

something Mozilla doesn't even dare, as that's where they get all their Google money from

Or because they're aware that it'd be a huge waste of time and money? It'd be a lot of work to build a search engine anywhere near as good as the existing alternatives, so it'd give worse user experience and waste time.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’d be a lot of work to build a search engine anywhere near as good as the existing alternatives,

And yet Brave Search has done so. You got to have to come up with better excuses for Mozilla's failure here.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla pushes DuckDuckGo. That is a feature, not a failure.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

How exactly are they pushing DuckDuckGo by making Google the default? And anyway, DuckDuckGo is just a wrapper around Bing, so that's not even much of an improvement.

[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just because you like Brave the search engine doesn't mean you have to use Brave the browser. The two have no inherent connection.

Edit: While we're on the subject of money, I'd be more worried about that Peter Thiel money Brave took. That man openly claims freedom and democracy to be incompatible and supports efforts to create independent libertarian societies on international waters and in space.

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

I use brave search from firefox, seems the least shitty search engine so far.

Nothing against brave the browser, I've just been using firefox for about 10 years so have a lot of inertia.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or there’s Safari or Orion, neither of which are what you listed. Also, Firefox is not “paid for by google” they get funding through their nonprofit as well.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, Firefox is not “paid for by google”

Around 85% of the $450 million they get each year come from Google.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

It's not like google is guiding their development processes, come off of this horseshit.