this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
253 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
496 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tmpod@lemmy.pt 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They sure will fight it. The main counter-argument I see is water proofing, but I believe I've seen a phone with good proofing but still accessible. Don't remember the brand and model though.

[–] ____@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Samsung Galaxy S5 was a good example of this. The back panel and battery was removable, and the charging port had an extra plastic cover that went on top to protect against water ingress

[–] tmpod@lemmy.pt 2 points 1 year ago

Dang, looking at those phones from back then, they were such good designs. Simple yet effective.