this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
667 points (95.5% liked)

Atheist Memes

5453 readers
13 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Science still has not touched on any adequate way whatsoever the hard question of consciousness.

Neither have a lot of religions. The eastern, "secular" religions are the major that have at least made an attempt to tackle the problem.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Science still fundamentally has a better approach then religion. Even if the true cause of religion is a god science will find it. But it's honestly probably not sadly.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think you're generally right. Perhaps "the scientific method" is a but more accurate than just "science". But I agree.

I just like to remind some of these people that this is a real problem and not something people can just run roughshod over or brute force like some people like Daniel Dennett try to do.

[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Define "not touched".

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consciousness is something you have to understand. We are still in the process of getting the pieces together.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh... sort of, maybe. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "understand."

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago

Putting the pieces together.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like this is largely incorrect. You may not understand consciousness, but to calm that science hasn't touched it whereas eastern religions have is wildly inaccurate. Both Western and Eastern philosophers have considered consciousness at great length. Science has excellent maps and models of the human brain and we have had passable functional theories of mind for several decades. Is it complete? No, but science is rarely complete. Is it the forefront of a lot of research? Absolutely.