Linux

33 readers

2 users here now

founded 2 years ago

Will Flatpak and Snap replace desktop Linux native apps? (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago by staticlifetime@kbin.social to c/linux@kbin.social

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Actually, the better question is: When will they replace most desktop Linux programs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sandboxing and greater flexibility in using older or conflicting packages/libraries.

[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sandboxing is a buzzword here. Look at the flatpaks, people don't sandbox, they apply the maximum permissions until the application stops making errors at startup. This is not sandboxing.

And don't expect for a second that the security will be enforced on older libraries.

[–] staticlifetime@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

people don't sandbox

Yes they do. Do they all sandbox all things? No. Does it require sandboxing? No. But these are moot points. If you need it, you can have it. These are not available with traditional packages. Whether or not something works properly when sandboxed is sort of a side point, because it simply means that stuff needs to be worked-out. Since when do we have perfect stuff out of the box in FOSS though?

You're holding it to greater standards, IMO.

[–] TGRush@forum.fail 1 points 1 year ago

Users upping permissions is not something that Flatpak is to blame for.

Flatpak has set the groundwork for sandboxing of desktop apps with a runtime permission system. People dont yet know how to properly use it.