this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
175 points (100.0% liked)

urbanism

22534 readers
24 users here now

This was supposed to be c/traingang, so post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Trainposts highly encouraged

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I grew up in a city of mostly rowhomes and I love them. Plan on buying one one day.

You still get walk-ability, sense of community and good population density (not as good as a high-rise but still good), but also more privacy, and the space is more conducive to raising a family than an apartment. Also they're cute as fuck and people can paint them different colors and have cool little gardens on their porches and stuff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Habitat 67 is another building designed for this sort of thing. The idea was high density but with gardens and a sense of community, and designed around mass-produceable modules that could be configured in a customized way. A lot of people dislike the look because the modular fabrication method used a lot of concrete, but I still think it's a neat idea, both the original concept and the actual implementation which was trimmed down for budget reasons.

It was intended to produce cost-effective public housing, but since all we have is the prototype that was built for a world fair, there's a fair bit of history and novelty involved that means the units are fairly expensive these days iirc.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_67

[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That seems to just have increased surface area, making thermal issues worse? They look pretty cool, but seem very ineffective for many of the problems with housing, including the overuse of high environmental impact materials like concrete

Just seems like it more of an attempt at modularity with a focus on the least necessary things. Something to learn from, I guess, but not very useful

[–] JuneFall@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

You are very right. While it looks nice in terms of energy usage it is horrible. Design is also controversial and not ideal imho. Looks fun though.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As art and as a demonstration of the range of what's possible, it does well. I don't think it's meant to be an example of what a common approach should be though.

[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like it as art for what could be possible! It's fun and cool like that. Just not for any utility really

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

It is important for us to have these things to remind us of what is possible, and to allow a broader range of imagination.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Looks great to me. Thermal properties are an issue though.