Archived version: https://archive.ph/OfNYb
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825183014/https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/25/fifth-circuit-says-law-enforcement-doesnt-need-warrants-to-search-phones-at-the-border/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Unfortunately, "the border", as defined in US customs law, extends 100 miles inland from the coast. That covers the entire urbanized eastern and western seaboards, or 2/3 of the US population.

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Holy shit. If I'm mathing correctly, that's like 12% of the entire land mass of the contiguous US.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

And also where most of the people live.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

It's also where a majority of the population lives.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They've also been trying to claim that international airports are "external boundaries", and that their power extends 100 out from there. So even "safe" places like, say, Denver or Indianapolis or St. Louis wouldn't be safe if they have their way.

[–] invno1@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Talk about overreach.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

And into most of Canada :)