Economics

1698 readers

2 users here now

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

379

Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)

submitted 1 year ago by CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work to c/economics@lemmy.ml

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stizzah@feddit.it 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Owning a house that you don't inhabit is weirder.

[–] pedro@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So renting a house for your vacation is also weird?

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's certainly wasteful. If people are going without any proper shelter, then having extra, mostly vacant housing to yourself should be discouraged.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

This right here. The US averages some thirty unoccupied houses for every homeless person. A lot of those are just owned by investment firms who will sit on them because housing is treated as an investment first and a human need second. It's not a supply problem, it's a fucking greed problem.