Work Reform

9981 readers

191 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

366

Forcing Workers Back to the Office Might Not Have Been a Good Idea After All (futurism.com)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/workreform@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A new survey shows that the vast majority of senior executives say would've approached their return-to-work push "differently."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mycroft@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No. Even that is incorrect.

You are 4 nodes deeper in OSS intel required, (isemployee->hasaccess?->homeaddress->break in)

I also know there are only 2 people with keys to my home, the hours of operation are limited, and there are no 3rd parties with unrestricted physical access (maintenance, physical security, janitorial services.)

The only difference in person provides is a record of access, cameras and access control systems etc.

My home also has this record of access and if requested can be provided. Most folks have egress cameras nowadays too.