this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
808 points (98.0% liked)

Apple

17455 readers
58 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you mean BLE. As far as I understand it, RFID doesn't have any particular advantage over barcodes for tracking luggage.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago

Barcodes need line of sight with scanners and close range. RFID detectors can sense tags at larger distances and just based on general proximity.

BLE is also an option, comparison to RFID would depend on setup particularities. RFID would be the more natural choice for throwaway, recyclable stickers that just need to store a short "dumb" ID.

[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

RFID is easier to read, so you could set up scanners at more places. Also easier to walk around looking for a bag and know that it's somewhere in this pile.