I don't actually think. I just know I'm right. Then whenever I'm in an argument I can just link the [word we're arguing about] wikipedia article. Since I'm right and wikipedia has objective information the argument is over every time and I win.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Did you have something useful to add to the conversation?

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You may as well talk to a wall. It would be about as useful although probably less frustrating.

[–] AlfredoBonannoFofana@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You man have more luck in talking to 'walls' or people in general if you were willing to engage in good faith discussion

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something most hexbear users do not do.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

If you would reread the thread you'd notice it begins with the hexbear user making a simple request, which the user could not fulfill. Any further questions in the discussion were met with derision, which is when the bad-faith behaviour was reciprocrated by the hexbear user. Please do better and hold yourself to at least half the standard you expect of others

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)