this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Apple

17543 readers
36 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When should have we stopped developing new processors and computing architectures? I just want to make sure that we never improve upon existing tools to avoid that pesky planned obsolescence.

Pentium? Core Duo? Core i7? AMD Ryzen? Apple M1?

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Never, but the yearly iterations are there to keep people upgrading. Same thing with cars.

Some people need the newest hottest thing when they could upgrade every 5-7 years (10-15 in the case of cars) and be fine and companies cash in on that.

It was roughly 2 years between the M1 and M2 which is a longer time between generation refreshes than Intel and about on par with AMD. The A series updates roughly as often as the top tier Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 processors. Apple really isn't doing anything outside of industry norms here.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Doesn't really apply here, I'm perfectly happy with my m1 and will be for years. If Apple wanted to design these processors for planned obsolescence they wouldn't make them run so damn fast.

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think what the guy above is missing is the concept that companies schedule certain performance aspects on a timer so that they can release things in the most financially beneficial release cycle with only enough performance benefit to maximize their sales numbers. People seem to think that tech companies like these are releasing their very best product at coincidentally regular intervals with surprisingly similar performance increases