this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
19 points (55.2% liked)

World News

32304 readers
482 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And another important thing to bear in mind is that the start of the advance is the hardest part of the advance. Russia has built up a thick crust of defensive lines. At some point the advance penetrates that crust, and then the gooey center goes much more quickly.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unless the Russians abandoned all of good Soviet military doctrine (which is quite possible since they're so virulently anti-communist), that is the furthest from the truth possible.

The Soviet military doctrine has been Deep Operation since the founding of the nation, where there is no single hard battlefront, instead keeping the combat line deep and flexible. Unless there is significant evidence to the contrary, I would assume that the operational paradigm for the Russian military remains the same.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

combat line

If there's a "combat line" then there's another side to that line.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not exactly a line. It's miles and miles of defensive fortifications, entrenchments, units, and supply lines in a myriad configurations. There's no breaking through it in a traditional sense. Like I said earlier, the entire doctrine of warfare is different, like how the US armed forces doctrine is based on aerial support.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I'm talking about. How is that a line to break through? It's a mesh of defensive fortifications miles deep.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not seeing a "mesh" on that map. I'm seeing a line. There's a speckling of fortifications deeper in, but a military that has broken through that line isn't going to have much trouble with a speckling. That's the "gooey center" I was talking about. The main strength is concentrated along the line.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your own map shows fortifications all over the theater. Yes, there's more concentrated towards the front naturally. Are you talking about that?

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. That's the thick crust of defensive lines. Once you're through that it becomes easier to move.

The whole point here is that people are complaining that the offensive is "moving slowly" and I'm pointing out that of course it's moving slowly, it has to get through the most heavily defended regions first. Once it's done that it'll move more quickly.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, exactly. The soviet defensive doctrine is partially inefficient because they wanted the entire operational area to be hardened without a specific weak point to exploit or breakthrough. The offensive army is forced to Trudge 😉 through the entire region.

[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Now I want cupcakes. Dammit.