this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
398 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Louisiana Republican said he thinks the charges related to the former president’s mishandling of classified documents after he left office are “almost a slam dunk."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not going to downvote you for saying something I disagree with like everyone else seems to be doing, but I think that would be a way worse outcome for a variety of reasons.

  1. The most obvious: Trump escapes punishment for his crimes. One if not the central issue here is that no one should be above the law and if we fail to convict and punish a president who commits crimes, we demonstrate that some people are indeed above the law. Holding him criminally accountable is therefore a test of the very integrity of our judicial system.

  2. If we "trade" Trump a clean slate for his promise (or somehow a legally enforceable agreement, although I'm not sure there's any real legal ground for that) to stay out of politics, then we demonstrate that this whole thing really is about politics, not justice, and the Right's view of this whole thing is validated.

  3. Trump is wily enough that he will find a way to continue having an influence over politics even without the ability to tweet or use other social media or public statements. One of the benefits of putting him in prison is that he can't do this anywhere near as easily.

  4. Trump's base will consider his freedom a win and accept any explanation he provides them for why it was a "good deal" for them as well. He can then choose any proxy candidate he cares for and his base will obediently vote for them in Trump's place, creating a puppet president. Again, this is not so easily done if he's in prison.

  5. Voters of all stripes could see this as a sign of weakness in the Biden administration or an indication that the cases against Trump really were flimsier than the media has been reporting. This could potentially affect how people vote or voter turnout in 2024.

Overall, I think it's a no-brainer: we have to prosecute Trump to the best of our ability. Failure to do so proves our judicial system is broken and leaves Trump free to continue to influence politics. The GOP will remain the Trump Party for as long as he is alive and able to speak cogently. No, for the good of our country and our political system, we need to give him what he deserves. We're at a very precarious moment in our history right now, wherein close to half of our country has abandoned reason and empiricism in favor of blind loyalty to a demagogue. In 20 years, our history must reflect that we didn't cave or compromise with this insanity and instead asserted that truth and justice are vitally important to us as a nation. I don't care if it hurts half the nation's feelings. Hopefully, in 20 years, those people's children will grow up to know their parents were sadly deluded by their own prejudices and political biases, and we may yet see the return of a sane conservative populace.