this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
90 points (94.1% liked)

GenZedong

4294 readers
198 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You don't need to watch the video. Tom Scott/None of the interview subjects ever point out how fucked this is, but basically the story is rich sadists would put coins in boiling water and then throw them at poor children to watch them endure injury for small amounts of money as a form of entertainment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The idea of money, the idea of the nobles. We shouldn’t do things that started as a nobel activity

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the idea of the nobles

it clearly isn't, the elected mayor and citizens are distributing the coins

The idea of money

no-one's eliminated that one yet, you'll need to be a bit more patient on expecting people to not put cultural purchase on the medium for modern life, even in AES

We shouldn’t do things that started as a nobel activity

turn over your keyboard comrade. writing was invented for the noble class' record-keeping and taxes. <---specious but i want to illustrate why we need to exercise restraint on stuff like this, especially before it gets to points like 'urbanism and intellectualism are bourgeois'

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obviously certain inventions can benefit everyone but was just available to the bourgeois first. Same with medical treatment. And no, this is a minor issue for now but overall we shouldn’t defend the use as a concept. The difference is that this encourages the past ideas whilst writing does not

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

writing absolutely encourages past ideas, when people have access to those old ideas written down, or advocate them through writing.

and is the transformation of this ritual not a sign of encouraging ideas of the present? a female mayor, the ceasing of the heating of the coins, the lack of noble participation, couldn't i argue that this festival has been 'reclaimed' and embraces democratic values now?

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, if a writing encourages the ideas of the past then it also must be rejected and suppressed. Writing isn’t inherently reactionary but this is as it can’t be used for anything else. There is no reason to reclaim concepts that we do not need