this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
606 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59237 readers
3447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

the only reason anyone still uses this shit is ignorance

[–] HeneryHawk@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a very very rare occasion I've had to use it for scene cracks as other apps didn't work. They use WinRAR to archive it so on those very rare occasions it's the only thing that unpacks it

[–] justastranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

WinRAR also lets you delete files from a RAR archive, 7zip does not.

[–] nicolairathjen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For me it’s laziness.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I bought a lifetime license literally more than 20 years ago to support the developer. I use 7Zip for most stuff but prefer WinRAR for split rar archive support.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's, quite ironically, a pretty ignorant opinion. There are areas where WinRAR is stronger than 7zip.

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The person you replied to never mentioned 7-Zip, and there's forks and other programs that are probably just as strong in the same areas.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"probably"

The commenter implied that there's a tool which is better than WinRAR in everything and therefore there can't possibly be a reason to use WinRAR. Which application is it then?

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd need to know the areas you consider 7-Zip to be stronger in first, because I can't think of anything myself.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As an example, RAR provides parity records which allows recovery of large amounts of compressed data in case of data corruption. 7zip can lose all its content if one bit is flipped.

RAR provides much more support for underlying file system support which makes it more suitable as an archival tool. Things like NTFS hard links, streams, ACLs, all three timestamps. 7zip doesn't support that.

WinRAR in general has way more niche features for advanced use cases, while 7zip focuses on the basics.