this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
340 points (100.0% liked)

196

16449 readers
2147 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First choice had a 33% success chance, second will be 50% let's switch

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

after switching the probability becomes 66%. we talked about this one in my theory of probability class, it’s very counterintuitive!

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Help a noob out, is that because it's still 3 but one failure is revealed?

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

You have Doors "Win" "Lose" and "Lose"

There is a 33% chance to pick a winning door and a 66% chance to pick a losing door.

If you pick one of the losing doors, the other losing door is revealed and switching gives you 100% success. That combines to 100% in 66% of cases.

If you pick the winning door one of the losing doors is revealed, switching gives you a 0% chance of success. That combines to 0% in 33% of cases.

Always switching gives you 66% chance of success overall. Always staying is betting on having picked the correct door when you only had a 33% chance of picking correctly.

For all the pedants out there: the remaining 1% is the chance of summoning the ghost of Monty Hall who then drags you to probability hell. Probably.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Imagine you chose a door, then you are immediately offered to switch your choice to both of the two other doors. If one of the two is the correct one, it will go there automatically and you win.

It should be obvious that switching and betting on two doors is better. But this scenario is actually effectively the same as the original one where a failure door is revealed before you can choose to switch.