this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1066 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59568 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asunaspersonalasst@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or an adequate mass transportation system.

[–] grue@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or walkable zoning, lack of which is the fundamental cause of the car dependency.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The lack of continuous sidewalks drives me nuts. A developer might put in a sidewalk but the one next to them doesn't. Sometimes you are walking alongside a ditch or have to cross a busy road to continue on.

[–] grue@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

As much as I'm inclined to agree with @MaggiWuerze@feddit.de, the real reason is typically that all new developments are required to include sidewalks, but existing ones aren't required to retrofit. So you get a patchwork of sidewalks installed over time as things get torn down and rebuilt.

The "annoying and pedestrian hostile" part is municipalities' unwillingness to infill sidewalks in front of old developments at taxpayer expense.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Almost like it's designed to be annoying and pedestrian hostile