this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
582 points (92.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
580 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We only have to convince people to hate one more car than they already despise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I swear y'all are rotten in the brain

You think we drive around and sit in traffic because we just like doing it?

We drive because we have no other options. Driving sucks, almost everyone hates it, it's just the most efficient option by a landslide in most of the US.

[–] gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah but the thing is: most you do nothing to change that and some of you actively prevent change.

[–] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are there people here who don’t know that? You’re preaching to the choir.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are there people here who don’t know that?

Yes. Quite a few. Plenty of terminally online cyclists think motorists are intentionally trying to run them over, it's insane. Like literal mental illness levels of persecution complex. Every time fuckcars pops up on my feed I see it at least once and call it out.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't think there are some drivers that actively try to scare cyclists off the road then you don't ride a bike. Hint: they often drive black lifted pickup trucks with tinted windows; you know the type.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but that's because they're assholes, not because they own a vehicle. They're like that outside of their Small Penis Cope Machines too. They litter, they're rude, etc.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Earlier you said:

Plenty of terminally online cyclists think motorists are intentionally trying to run them over

And I have explained why cyclists know that some drivers are indeed aggressive towards them: punishment passes, honking, etc.

Sure but that’s because they’re assholes, not because they own a vehicle

That is moving the goalposts. It's easier to admit that you were wrong and we can all move on.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said

motorists

You said

some drivers

The brain rot cyclists I'm talking about think all drivers hate cyclists. Everyone knows these assholes hate cyclists. Some of the terminally online types think everyone behind the wheel is like them

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It only takes one crash to injure or kill a cyclist -- there's no such thing as a fender bender when you are on two wheels.

Try commuting by bike for a month and you will understand why cyclists are so distrustful of cars in North America. It's a lot scarier than drivers realize.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our job as sapient beings is to rise above things that scare us and still discuss them rationally.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Give it a shot. Experiment. Learn something new.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could just not ignore what I said, maybe

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are dismissing the experience of a group of people whose experience you have obviously not shared. Have you looked up statistics of car crashes and the incidence of injuries and deaths of cyclist in your area?? I have. Have you experienced the reality of commuting by bike in a North American city? I have.

I'll be happy to continue this conversation with a person that has done the minimum to learn and understand reality.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You are dismissing the experience of a group of people

No, I am dismissing the concept of basing reasoning - and policy - off of fear, or any emotion. When it comes to making policy and shaping a societal narrative, experience is good. Emotion, however, is very bad.

[–] johnlawrenceaspden@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, we think you're on your phone, asleep at the wheel, halfwitted, careless, angry and frustrated and in a hurry.

And you don't really remember the highway code, because that was some guff you had to study for an exam when you were eighteen. Nobody really drives like that, right?

And you've usually been driving for more than an hour so your minds aren't really on the job.

And you've got the music on really high and it keeps distracting you at important moments.

The few drivers who actually are soulless malevolent murderers who enjoy the thought of running over pedestrians and cyclists really make the other 90% look bad though.

This place is like a zoo for stupid people, it's great.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you mean it's the most efficient for personal choice given current political conditions, or do you mean it's the most efficient for a society to organise around and for politicians to plan for?

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most efficient route for an individual to get from A to B. Probably the least efficient as a standard for society when you factor in carbon emissions.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Precisely. That's what this sub is about.

Also, if you've lived in an area that's really designed properly like Amsterdam, renewable transport is more convenient than cars are in America

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I hope we get to that point too.