this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
264 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

34879 readers
46 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a good example, why not all devices should be connected to foreign servers. Errors can happen everywhere. But it could end badly, if some Corporations make errors and creating trouble, which would otherwise not happen.

In the case of the 3D-printer it is not that bad (except it destroys itself or even gets on fire), also you can turn it off. But imagine a smart stove top that lights up a towel (or something similar) while nobody is home.

Not, that I think that it is not useful to have something like that, but wouldn't it be nice, if that stuff would work locally? (with the WireGuard integration in modems, the access from outside of home with the smartphone, should also be no problem for non-tech people)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] demesisx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

But surely, a 3D printer could/can. It's just that the software that runs on it shouldn't have shit security and there should be multiple safeguards and redundant fail-safe systems.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It shouldn't be be required to use a cloud service in order to use a piece of hardware that you bought and paid for.

I'm disturbed seeing so many of the new consumer targeted 3D printers (and so many other products) going in the "cloud required" direction.

[–] demesisx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

shouldn’t be be required to use a cloud service in order to use a piece of hardware that you bought and paid for.

of course. I didn't really insinuate that it should.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't disagreeing with you.

[–] Nate@postit.quantentoast.de 5 points 1 year ago

That's true.

Like in the example, Why the heck should a stove should need cloud access. Or even better... a tesla power wall... -.-

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree. I think 3D printers don't need any security because they shouldn't be accessible directly from the internet.

If you want to 3D print things remotely, you should put your printers on a DMZ and use a piece of software that bridges the DMZ that starts/manages jobs, and hide that behind a VPN and MFA.

As you said, multiple layers of security, but I don't think 3D printers should be expected to provide any of that, except maybe checksums on print jobs so they don't print corrupted files. Have hardware vendors focus on making their hardware better, have software vendors focus on making their software better, etc. Once you start expecting hardware vendors to manage security properly, you dun goofed.

[–] Nate@postit.quantentoast.de 1 points 1 year ago

Thats true. I assumed that the bamboo Labs printer has some kind of thermal shutdown / overheating protection.

But i guess that is not enough. They should also habe a fire detection. Something like a smoke detector (optional would also be fine)

My printer got one installed above (but this one is because i fear that my PSU is catching fire xD )