this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Ask exploding heads

3 readers
1 users here now

Ask a question, any question

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably that on average women vote more poorly than men (due to being empathetic ) causing societies that allow women to vote to destabilize. I think a better model would be house hold vote. A single vote per house hold. Must be married with biological children to vote. Man and woman have to decide together.

[–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Example of what i'm talking about in England.

England is not a nation of migrants it's a nation of long-settled indigenous tribes. And because half the vote is going to swing in the direction of "Compassion". There will be no British people in two generations. But all the countries where those migrants came from will still be there.

She is speaking exactly how her biology has programmed her to speak. "How would you feel if our children". But it's not her children, it's millions of soldier aged men looking for economic opportunity.

why I think the vote should come from mated pairs or widows or old grandfathers. Not to feminine not to masculine. Must have built something for society. I think it would yield a better society. To late now the west will be destroyed but in a perfect world that would happen.