As Watling himself puts it: “Unhardened UAVs are disposable tools like munitions and get consumed very rapidly. You need them in your force and you need them to be cheap.”

For decades, Western armies have relied on a few expensive, 'exquisite' high-tech platforms, and that includes drones. This conflict of disposable drones may lead to a radical change in military procurement towards the many and the cheap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mysticaldeknoi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“…even if the figure really is 10,000, this appears sustainable…10,000 DJI quadcopters at an average cost of about $1,000 would be $10m. Last week, Russia lost an Su-34 bomber, with a sticker price of something over $40m…

“And yesterday Russia apparently lost an even more advanced Su-35, which goes for around $85m. Together these two aircraft alone represent a loss ten times as great as all Ukraine’s drones for the month put together.“

The headline is pretty much clickbait. $10m is a drop in the bucket.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah! I thought it was interesting that it's not a big deal.

[–] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Great breakdown, very enlightening