this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
46 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10168 readers
18 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Mr. Meadows is entitled to remove this action to federal court because the charges against him plausibly give rise to a federal defense based on his role at all relevant times as the White House Chief of Staff to the President of the United States,” attorneys for Meadows wrote in the Tuesday filing in the Northern District of Georgia.

“Nothing Mr. Meadows is alleged in the indictment to have done is criminal per se: arranging Oval Office meetings, contacting state officials on the President’s behalf, visiting a state government building, and setting up a phone call for the President. One would expect a Chief of Staff to the President of the United States to do these sorts of things,” the filing states.

“This is precisely the kind of state interference in a federal official’s duties that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Irv@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was thinking "long analysis" might be 20-30 pages, but holy crap! A 300 page PDF, from November before we even knew what the charges were...

[–] Irv@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Haha yes it's overall very long, but the section on this specific question isn't too long, just 3 pages.