this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
1231 points (98.3% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

28933 readers
3 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wow. Front page of huffpost.com right now. Interesting...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] damipereira@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

At this point I think he's immolating himself on purpose, and after the api changes are done a new saviour CEO will come, who won't reverse anything, but with a clean record.

[โ€“] Paleheart@pawb.social 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I dont think his plan is even that deep. They have an ipo coming up and spez is set to make yacht money. he doesnt care if he burns the site to the ground cause he still walks out with a giant paycheck

[โ€“] damipereira@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They do stuff like that sometimes, like twitter is doing now, by putting a woman CEO right after Elon set everything on fire, so that twitter vocal minority can blame her and say that Elon was doing everything better. It's what they call the Glass Cliff. Something similar might be happening here, without the anti-feminist part.

[โ€“] cooljacob204@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They have already done this once. I wonder if anyone here remembers the previous CEO...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)