this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
1382 points (96.3% liked)

Murdered by Words

1558 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1382
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SomeoneElse@lemmy.world to c/murderedbywords
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] landsharkkidd@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that they say "a female" because that's how they "identify" people via police reports and such. But I still cringe so bad when I hear someone say "a female".

Female what? Deer? Shark? Dog?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's part of it, but police jargon is meant to dehumanize suspects. They could just as easily say man or woman but those words imply person-hood. While animals can be male or female they can't be a man or woman. Male-Black-46 works just as well to describe an animal in a study as a human on the street.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

The words “man” and “woman” imply that the person is an adult, which is an unnecessary added connotation.