this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
976 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59673 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh no.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

> Downfall

Is the Intel CEO holed up in a bunker and raging at his chip designers?

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it's anything like the industry that I work in, the CEO would have been informed of the short comings of the design numerous times and given a response along the lines of "does it make our CPUs faster and more powerful though?".

The CEO won't be pissed of at his chip designer, they'll be pissed because they've been caught out.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Given that the AMD vulnerability was called "Inception," maybe they just like using movie titles to name CPU vulnerabilities?