this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

106 readers
2 users here now

Discuss Games, Hardware and News on PC Gaming **Discord** https://discord.gg/4bxJgkY **Mastodon** https://cupoftea.social **Donate** https://ko-fi.com/cupofteasocial **Wiki** https://www.pcgamingwiki.com

founded 1 year ago
 

YouTube's 'Cycu1' has shared an early graphics video comparison between the 2022 and 2023 demos of Starfield.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure their hand picked "downgrade" that made it to the thumbnail is worse. The face is different, but it's probably more realistic. I really doubt you'd see that much contrast in the real world in a helmet there. The rest of the outfit is a significant upgrade.

[–] Clairvoidance@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely prefer the more saturated colors but the pictures are entirely out of context to a point where you can't really judge

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I like the way the metals pop in the newer version, and the materials of the equipment moved from shiny plastic to some kind of actual fabric based gear. I tend to go pretty vibrant when I can manage it editing my personal pictures, so I understand the appeal of a punchy look, but it takes pretty careful calibration to keep it from looking really fake in motion. Having a variety of materials is what allows the really flashy stuff to pop. If everything is shiny it loses its appeal fast.

I do find the more contrasty face more appealing, but behind a helmet I don't think it's realistic. The other faces that aren't covered look like they have more depth, but the difference in their prime example is all about the helmet diffusing some light.