this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
347 points (87.8% liked)

Science

13019 readers
7 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kalipike@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jeez what a title. I bet most folks read the title and assume it means better for health reasons not environmental reasons.

[–] Shikadi@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It says environmental in the title?

[–] kalipike@lemmy.one -3 points 1 year ago

Yes, but at the very end, and humans are unfortunately known to only half-dead titles and then run with it haha.

[–] darq@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good thing both of those conclusions are true.

[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m pretty sure I read a meta analysis that concluded that a little meat is better than no meat. But that hardly matters bc when you tell someone about paleo they end up shoveling chicken, beef, and dairy down their throat with little to no vegetables and fruits (I think from the same analysis)

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ohh, you've got proof a vegan diet is better for you? It's definitely something I've heard but I've never seen the proof.