Privacy

32169 readers

376 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

832

Maker of Chrome extension with 300,000+ users tells of constant pressure to sell out (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by aranym@lemmy.name to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Actors who are asking me to add some tracking code are mostly interested in reselling users' data," Anashkin said. "Actors who want to purchase it outright will stuff it with malware depending on their level of greed: hijacking affiliate links, tampering with search results, showing popups with shady websites, etc."

Anashkin's experience appears to be fairly common. Developers have discussed these solicitations in online forums and several have written blog posts about selling extensions or partnership offers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca 187 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Been spending the past little while reading the documented offers he gets.

I feel sick to my stomach.

[–] psyc@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Was not expecting that many

[–] lolgcat@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Props to Oleg/hoverzoom for maintaining and updating this list for all to read. It's my first time seeing any document of this kind really. Quiet chilling

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wowza. That’s terrible. Thank goodness he hasn’t sold out; I love hoverzoom. If only my freaking work’s IT wouldn’t’ve banned extensions 🙃

[–] Llewellyn@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now you understand why your IT do that.

[–] Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I prefer to feel proud that there are still people who don't fall for that and have values. And there always will be.

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago

Jesus… it is time to seriously re-evaluate and pare back the extensions I use. Ugh.

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Wow that is genuinely chilling

[–] salient_one@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a depressing read, thank you!

[–] unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You are welcome ☺️.

[–] celmit@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

1/25/2021

We'd love to have redacted sponsor Hover Zoom+ in a similar manner to how we're partnering with Dark Reader. See attached for how that partnership has come to life, but we're honestly super flexible on implementation. We'd essentially love to pay you in exchange for helping us drive users to redacted.

So wtf does this mean? Is Dark Reader hammered as of 2021?

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Those are some insultingly low offers, considering they want to malwareify (that's totally a word now) hundreds of thousands of innocent people.