this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
976 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59673 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh no.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They really should be recalled like they were forced to when the fdiv bug happened https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Recall billions of processors?

I hate Intel as much as the next person, but I don't want them to disappear overnight generating a unimaginably large processor shortage.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then subsidize them for the recall, and take a percentage of their profits every year until it's paid back. How is it OK to pass on a manufacturer defect to all consumers?

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not saying that it's not a shit sandwich. I am saying that if Intel shut down right now we'd be pretty fucked. It would be far more likely for them to shut down production and walk away, start selling off patents and equipment. The strain it would put on arm to pick up the gauntlet would probably mean you're not going to see a new cell phone, television or new car for the next few years.

What the hell are they going to do for a recall anyway? Are you going to have them go back 5 years and try to recreate every model of CPU between then and now? None of those motherboards are going to support new things.

You get your five or $600 back on your CPU which ends up being $50 by the time it comes out of arbitration, now you need not only a new CPU but a new motherboard.

It's like wrecking your 15-year-old beater car, insurance company gives you $150 and says go find yourself a new car.

edit: Look, Intel is worth 150 billion. if they paid $50 per processor for a couple billion refunds, they'd just go bankrupt. They're going to run for years subsidized making 0 profit and losing all their talent. It wasn't their intent to screw it up, but here we are. There's a patch that makes slow processors slower honestly, that's the end of their responsibility other than to help people get it installed.

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blame the patent duopoly for making them too-big-to-fail™

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We have a lot of that going on, but blame won't fix the outcome. Can't pass any laws to fix it, the government is run by the politicians.