this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
976 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59237 readers
3694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh no.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Intel’s newer 12th-gen and 13th-gen Core processors are not affected.

Oh ok

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Upgrade to get 3% performance gains on paper and no noticeable real performance gain!

[–] glockenspiel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Now it's more like "upgrade to maintain your level of performance, because our patched CPUs take a 50% performance hit" (per the article).

That is quite convenient for them. I'm sure not a conspiracy given depth of the issue, just very convenient if people heed the call.

Which most won't. Enterprise is likely already on the newer gens aa part of normal refresh cycles. Maybe this just accelerates that a bit.

[–] porksoda@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Oh don't worry, you'll hear about that vulnerability in two years.

*cries in 11th gen laptop*