this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
72 points (98.6% liked)

UK Politics

3096 readers
345 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is he talking about.. We only get 4% of gas from Russia. The majority comes from Norway.

Can we not just kick all these morons out?

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Global gas prices are influenced by what happens in Russia, so if we're dependent on any gas, we're somewhat influenced by Putin. Also, I think it's fair to argue that even 4% is 4% too much!

[–] tal@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

dependent on any gas

Wind's variable nature kind of means that one needs to use it in conjunction with natural gas or something similar that can fill in the gaps.

Maybe one could just use geothermal or nuclear, but if one goes with wind, unless one has a lot of hydropower capacity, there's probably also going to be some level of natural gas in the mix.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wind, nuclear, tidal, solar, geothermal and even biogas if deployed correctly — the combination can get us off fossil gas. I'm pro-nuclear myself, which I think is where Labour is leaning, too.

[–] Syldon 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The key lies in energy storage. Create more than you need during the peak times and store it by other means.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed, but more research and development is needed to scale up storage to that level, and that R&D will itself take time and money.