this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

16 readers
2 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago
 

https://kbin.social/m/modernmisogyny
I ran across that magazine recently and every post is transphobic af. Does that fit within kbin.social's code of conduct?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. You don't have the right to debate other people's right to exist. Such speech is an act of violence and should be treated as such.

I don't want a group of people sitting around "discussing" whether or not black people are inherently inferior either. That is not speech we should accept in the public sphere

[–] 10A@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Have you never heard "sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me"? It's preschool 101. Speech is never an act of violence.

Additionally, nobody is debating anyone's right to exist.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Says the person who's never heard their own right to exist or the rights of their loved ones called into question publicly.

You don't have the right to "debate" other people's equal rights.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except really, nobody's ever debating anyone's right to exist. That's absurd.

Consider this: If a mass murderer was captured and imprisoned, he could claim that the justice system opposes his right to exist. The trouble with that is he'd be completely incorrect. The justice system opposes his behavior of murder. No matter how much he believes his very existence is inextricably bound to his behavior of murder, the reality is he murders by choice, and it is that intentional action which the justice system opposes.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you just compare trans people living their lives without hurting anyone to murder?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, and I could have chosen any other action, but I chose murder because it's not contentious to express a disapproval of it.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did it ever occur to you that it's "contentious" to express "disapproval" of trans people existing because...there's nothing WRONG with trans people existing?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, sounds like you missed my entire point. Nobody objects to any people existing. Some people object to particular behaviors.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't think trans people exist and that being trans is "a behavior" equivalent with murder.

I definitely understood the "point" of your bigotry perfectly well.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. No, that's not what I think.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

And yet, it is what you said.

"Speech is never an act of violence" mfs when I use a public platform to smear them as child molesters, while simultaneously encouraging acts of vigilantism against "paedos": 😯