this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
273 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
425 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If no legal issues stand in your way and your uptime requirement warrant the invest, you can design and host your system across multiple providers. So instead of "just" going multi-datacenter within for example Azure, you go multi-datacenter across Azure, AWS, GCP, etc.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem with that, is that you now have to maintain virtual infrastructure in many different syntaxes. And features of one do not exist in another.

Plus things like cash and session do not cross those boundaries.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

They all offer managed kubernetes. So that would be my common divisor.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

How? Each cloud provider manages their cross-regional solutions in very specific ways, and they certainly don't cooperate with each other.