Privacy

31255 readers

603 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Cult of the Dead Cow Launches Encryption Protocol + ChatApp to Save Your Privacy (gizmodo.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The protocol is built from the same digital DNA as the Tor browser and the chat app Signal and will be used to create new ways for folks to communicate, share files, and generally surf the web while simultaneously protecting their privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

One of the complaints about Signal is that although the content is encrypted end to end, the sender and receiver are in the open. This is analogous to a postal service letter where the contents are unviewable. Signal now offers something to obscure the sender (like not putting a return address on a letter), but the receiver must be known to the servers in order to properly deliver it.

Although the Signal protocol is probably sent to the Signal servers encrypted, privacy enthusasts contend that it's possible that the maintainers of Signal could be coerced into providing the sender and receiver of messages, even if the messages are not viewable.