this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
104 points (62.9% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LazerDickMcCheese@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Audio engineer here, it's a trainable skill that takes a long time with comparing audio side-by-side

[–] Haarukkateroitin@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At to some point you can but after CD-quality you cannot. Did you read the article?

As sound engineer you should know that you use high quality to record but it makes no extra sense after CD-quality to listen.

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listen to a standard mp3, then listen to the same song as 32/96k FLAC. I bet most people can hear a difference. But no worries if you can't, its not a big deal

[–] Haarukkateroitin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mp3 is not CD-quality. As sound engineer you should know the difference. MP3 is old lossy format and you are comparing it to loseless.

There is people that can hear those differences in certain corner cases.

Also you are not defining any specs for mp3 but you are giving specs for FLAC. Why?

Can you hear difference between CD-quality and 32/96k FLAC? If you think you can then you are audiophile and not sound engineer.

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh hunny...I didn't say an mp3 is CD quality, you assumed that. I gave specs for the FLAC because "standard mp3" has specs; therefore you have two sets of specs to compare, silly goose. I can hear a difference, but that's because any studio engineer that is worth their money is going to be both.

[–] Haarukkateroitin@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because I was talking CD-quality not mp3. Anybody can hear difference between bad mp3 and loseless format. That is not issues.

Mp3 has two differend standards using the same name and at least mpeg-2 supports several frequencies. So there is no ”one mp3”.

Talking about three decades old lossy standard in 2023 is really stupid. There is even better lossy standards around.

With you knowledge I have hard time believing you work as audio engineer.

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your feedback. You're very brave and I appreciate you.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if listening to music from a "good quality phone" is enough for you, good for you. But why would you need to dis people who are craving for a better sound ?

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They're trolling on Lemmy, I guess? Haha I don't feel dissed though, its just communication

[–] Haarukkateroitin@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

I am not dissing. Just saying that you propably cannot hear difference in quality with that. The device has properties that do not make sense in listening quality.