this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37747 readers
715 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Without the possibility of creating a meta layer to let users group different communities into a single feed I just don't see how that's a positive. In fact I think without the additional layer people will do what we've done in Reddit, congregate into the largest community and the others die out (or find their own niche).
In fact you can see it happen right now. We have almost a dozen Technology communities in different instances, but because beehaw is the biggest people subscribe to that one. This is why Technology@Beehaw.org has more subscribers than all the others combined.
Of course nothing is stopping people from subscribing to all of them, but (from Reddit experience) it ends up getting pretty messy in the general subscribed feed.
well history shows you are probably correct, but i think that's the problem. i'm old enough to have been through this cycle many times now. it's just the reality that it costs money to run single large instances of anything, and that money has to come from somewhere. whoever is paying gets to control the direction of the community. historically that has not been the users and that's where the problem comes in.
i think allowing some kind of grouping functionality for different communities is a fairly simple UX issue really, which still needs to be solved, but shouldn't be a huge issue. to me the larger problem is discovery really.
This isn't an intrinsic limitation of the protocol but a matter of UX, and given how frequently it is requested it's bound to be implemented in some way by some project; if not Lemmy then maybe kbin or something new that crops up.
It's definitely seems doable, but it's a feature we don't have right now and the lack of it negates the benefit of having the same community in multiple instances, because it's just not usable.
I don't disagree. I want to see topic aggregation as soon as possible too.