Iain M. Banks died more than 11 years ago, but remains a titan of modern science fiction. He wrote “literary” works under the name Iain Banks, but added the “M” for his 14 sci-fi offerings, which are known for an audacious, ground-breaking take on the space opera that transformed the genre.
If you have never read any of these books but love “hard” sci-fi, is it worth diving in now?
Short answer: yes. Longer answer: Banks’s sci-fi, at its best, is staggeringly inventive, beautifully written, dramatic and often very funny. His stories are packed with ideas, warships with minds very much of their own, alien races, charismatic drones and intergalactic politics.
That said, time is a stern judge. I have read celebrated “classics” of sci-fi and found them startlingly misogynistic, homophobic and racist – even for their time. There is nothing so serious to worry about here, but Banks’s novels haven’t aged perfectly. I reread five for this column, and even as a dyed-in-the-wool fan, I couldn’t avoid the fact that, for books set in a future where men and women are meant to be equal, they don’t always read that way.
The species in question is called the Affront, which is a name they took on willingly. The Affront know that most of the galaxy thinks they're barbaric and pointlessly gruesome, and they revel in it. Think of them like a race of Klingon Donald Trumps. They're also very clearly not good guys and are not presented as such in the novel.
The main character I'd hesitate to call a hero, because he's not. His wish to join the Affront is seen as extraordinarily odd by his colleagues and the Culture in general, who only tolerate the Affront in order to avoid drawing them into war.
I can't read the full article on mobile but the premise is stupid. I've read most of the Culture novels and none of them felt sexist to me.