this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
417 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

10240 readers
703 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 22 points 19 hours ago (9 children)

They’re important questions but lots of these are pay and benefit related. Usually I discuss that after getting an offer, and I think that’s what companies expect too.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 17 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I get it that pay is negotiable, but i would expect benefits to be based on general policy for all employees.

And in a place like the US, whether you get healthcare or not is a huge deal. If the company cannot tell you that straight away, the HR just wants to waste everyones time.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Pay and benefits should be in the job description.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

As someone who lives in one of the two or three states where pay being listed in the job posting is now a legal requirement. Yes, ideally they should be. But our state just put this into law this year. And prior to that I think there was only one other US state with the requirement.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost 1 points 2 hours ago

I’m sure the U.K. has to tell you the pay, amongst other things.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago

It's a step in the right direction but still isn't perfect because they'll have huge ranges of salaries which are all made up and that is not in their budget. These make it into your filters but tell you nothing because of how unrealistic it is. Like $55k - $180k. When you get to the salary, they offer $60k and tell you that you'd need to be a god to get higher.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)