this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
199 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

60528 readers
4524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 66 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

TikTok being banned is good. Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter should be banned as well. Closed, source, manipulative and harmful algorithms should be banned and these apps all use dark patterns in their design.

The fediverse and open social networks where the algorithms are open source and well understood and the user is allowed to choose their own algorithms is the only safe way to use social media.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Trump may even welcome that, considering that Truth Social is just Mastodon.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 hours ago

Honestly I think it's a terrible precedent to set. Now the government can just say they don't like XYZ website and are banning it. That wasn't really something they did 10 years ago. Unless of course it was illegal activity. But I don't think this is a net win for the internet. Regardless of what decision has been made, freedoms were removed and citizens' rights were sidestepped for political means. I think it shouldn't be the government's job to protect us from ourselves.

I was totally onboard with banning tiktok on government computers and I was completely on board with the government publicly expressing concerns over the motives of tiktok as a business. That's where I personally believe this should have stopped. Inform the people of the danger and then let them decide what to do with that information.

The problem with that idea though, is that nation-wide, citizens' trust in the government is at an all-time low. So even if the government said tiktok is bad and you shouldn't use it, people already don't trust the government. Maybe they should work on regaining the trust their people had for them 65 years ago before it tries to get people to behave how they think we should.

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 84 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

A government that can ban social media sites is going to base their choices of which ones to ban on their preferences - not yours.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

The problem is not the government got to choose - in a functioning democracy, the government would represent the will of the people.

The problem is this democracy is fucked.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The EU seems to be handling it fine, the point is not targeting specific sites but targeting user hostile behaviors against citizens

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Governments can place qualifiers based on hostile behaviours but then still selectively enforce said restrictions on the platforms they want to target.

Such as with tiktok they specially worded the laws so that it only affected tiktok and not the others.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That is the thing that fear mongering against the Government always fails to address.

Yes, banning one thing out of ten that all do the same thing is wrong. Yes, we do not want to give the Government the ability to ban specific sites because history.

But banning or regulating algorithms, which are the actual problem, does not stop social media sites from existing. It just stops them from being able to manipulate massive groups of people by hiding/pushing the information the company wants one to see.

Unfortunately, the majority doesn't see algorithmic social media as a bad thing because they really do like echo chambers, and politicians don't ever seem to understand what a "root issue" is.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I still consider us in something like the teenage years as a society, just discovery something big like the Internet and social media and we're going to handle it poorly until we learn to handle it responsibly.

Heads or tails whether we make it to adulthood before the powers that be manage to wrangle things in their favor first. Signs point in a bad direction, but there's no saying that the tools that worked on society before won't break when the next thing comes along. Maybe ai will take a form that liberates, or hits the powerful far more negatively than it hits the masses.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 16 hours ago

Well it's a good thing they banned TikTok because it has "Closed, source, manipulative and harmful algorithms" and not for some other reason

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

If we left it up to our government, that’d probably be what happens

[–] mannycalavera 6 points 19 hours ago

No no no my friend. You misunderstand USAing. You sweet sweet summer child.