this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37604 readers
451 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One feature that might help with this is something similar to multi-reddits, where users can categorize communities into their own "meta communities".
IMO, this would solve the problem, while keeping the benefits of being decentralized. I could go to my “Community Group” called “Tech”, I could see all the aggregated results of Beehaw’s, kbin’s, etc, tech Communities.
While I haven't spent time looking at kbin, isn't that essentially what it does with its 'magazines'? I believe magazines are an automatic grouping of posts by hashtag, community, keyword, etc.
Afaik „magazines“ are just Lemmys „communities“ or reddits „subreddits“
Oh, good to know. For some reason I was under the impression that there was something 'more' to a Kbin magazine compared to a subreddit or Lemmy community. I'm sure I read about it somewhere and was sort of surprised at how flexible it seemed – but I can't seem to find it now, so I may have imagined it!
Oh. I didn't really realize that. But in looking at a few Magazines I follow, I only see content from my kbin.social instance, not any other instance. It's also possible that what you're saying is the intended functionality of kbin, but it might not be working yet since it isn't a mission critical feature.
This is the best solution I’ve come up with, but it’s going to result in a lot of duplicate posts (and the comments will still be fragmented). I’m following several technology communities and a lot of the posts are posted to each of these communities individually. This has always been my concern with federation (along with server health/durability)
It’s not the worst result, but I don’t know how well it will be received by more mainstream users. You also then have to solve discoverability of these “groups/metas”, and THAT has to be hosted on a federated instance so you could still end up with users confused on whether they should follow beehaws tech group or someone else’s….and round and round we go lol
(Just to be clear - I’m not against federation, it’s just such a starkly different model than the normal web that we really have to adjust our mindset and find truly novel solutions or adjust our expectations)
This would be a huge plus, especially if it could be a server-wide multi. Instance maintainers could create /c/technology@instance.com but make it contain content from a curated list of other federated instances with their own /c/technology or lists could be distributed containing popular technology communities and you could import that list as your /c/technology as a personal multi.
Server-side groupings would make it even more of a killer feature.
Good to see someone else thought of this feature. This would make the whole experience so much better.
I was thinking of something like that too, where if I want to post about a game, I can tag my post in 'gaming' as such so others can search for it.