this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
44337 readers
687 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, it turns out that I'm particularly good at explaining maths, up to algebra. I've helped family go from bad grades to good ones via tutoring, eventually to the point that they no longer needed me to be able to get good grades on their own.
Same with english, usually. The caveat to that one being literature not always working out right because a teacher wanting specific answers rather than the students showing their comprehension and analysis. But, if I was teaching, that wouldn't be an issue.
Sure as hell couldn't take anyone past high school levels in either, though I could likely teach creative writing at intro levels (which really isn't that hard at all)
The real issue is the stuff you have to do to be a teacher. It isn't as easy as understanding the subject, or being good at conveying that subject. There's a lot of planning involved, you've got tight time limits, there's paperwork and administrative tasks. That's not even covering the stuff for special needs students, or being able to match expectations of language and discipline.
So, while it turns out I'm a damn good tutor, I'd make a lousy teacher in a structured environment. Most of us would, even (and sometimes especially) the full on experts in a subject.
I will say though, teaching can be incredibly fun. I'm not talking the rewarding part, where you see someone getting better, or the pride in taking part in that. It's the process itself, of taking an idea, breaking it down, and then translating it to someone else in a way that works for them. That's not just a school subject thing, I've taught martial arts stuff here and there over the years, along with other things that were more piecemeal (like shading when drawing, but not necessarily other techniques). The process itself is just fun.
Groups are harder, obviously, and I've never liked time limits on things. If it takes an entire week to transfer the knowledge, or a month, or whatever, the important part is the learning to me. The bigger the group, the less realistic time you have per lesson, so it can end up being much harder to convey something to the point of retention the way you can do it with 1 on 1 instruction. It's one of those things where the longer your have between lessons, the less likely you are to transfer the skill because the student forgets.
I'm still butthurt that I wasn't able to teach in my field of work. If I had been able to, it would have added years, maybe a decade to my working life. But they don't allow it anywhere that I'm aware of, so meh.