this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
-3 points (41.2% liked)

Conservative

414 readers
15 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Your comment is too well articulated to assume you're really naive enough to believe that's a valid comparison. CA is a state in a massive country. What state handled homelessness better? What state has a bullet train?

I agree that CA/LA is poorly managed at many levels, but your arguments are nonsense and it has nothing to do with CA being democratic.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Almost every state has handled homeless better. California has always done a shit Job with the homeless population. Republic. Democrats. Doesn’t matter. They’ve never dealt with it well.