this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
88 points (87.3% liked)

politics

19335 readers
2561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Democrats thought they could get away with running a traditionally bad candidate.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm not really sure any of this even matters. The dems probably lost for something as stupid as inflation being attributed to the current administration. I bet if that doesn't come down or gets worse congress is gonna flip right back in two years. Everyone here has the damn memory of a goldfish.

If Democrats don’t treat voters like they’re distractable idiots with the memory of a goldfish they won’t win any more elections.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I think it matters because this election was one more nail in the neo-liberal coffin. I don't think the reactionary response is very good though. Instead of saying hey those rich ass rent seekers are taking too much of our economic pie the electorate picked the guy scapegoating immigrants. Historically this is probably a bad path. Personally I'm not a fan of the right wing authoritarians, and sadly the competition is going to be them fucking up not anyone challenging them outright.

Which could just be a natural outcome of our political system. Because, I am not sure that a representative democracy that allows rampant unchecked capitalism to buy our government, will ever be the check on power we need.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

I bet if that doesn’t come down or gets worse congress is gonna flip right back in two years.

It's very likely that it won't come down unless we have another pandemic situation, and even then only on certain commodities like gasoline that people will be using less of.

Considering how tariff-happy trump is, it's quite likely that prices will rise. Provided Republicans' attempts to fuck with the electoral process prove ineffective, it's entirely possible that Republicans will get rejected in '26.

It's horrifying that our hopes of anything getting better ride on Republicans being unwilling or unable to fuck things up in one arena while simultaneously seeing resounding success in fucking up another.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a food analogy harris is a soggy burger thats sat in the fridge for 2 days and wasn't good to begin with. Instead of eating the burger every single person in america who did not vote for harris went outside and ate a pile of glass shards.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Instead of eating the burger every single person in america who did not vote for harris went outside and ate a pile of glass shards.

sigh

People stayed home because Harris was a shit candidate. Like everyone on the left warned centrists they would. But since centrists would rather eat that pile of glass shards than ever listen to anyone to their left about anything, trump won.